Cover of: Lifting PUHCA restrictions | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Power. Read Online

Lifting PUHCA restrictions joint hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power and the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, second session, July 29, 1994. by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Power.

  • 214 Want to read
  • ·
  • 35 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office in Washington .
Written in English



  • United States.


  • Public utility holding companies -- Government policy -- United States.,
  • Electric utilities -- Government policy -- United States.,
  • Telecommunication policy -- United States.

Book details:

Edition Notes

ContributionsUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance.
LC ClassificationsKF27 .E5524 1994h
The Physical Object
Paginationv, 193 p. ;
Number of Pages193
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL883652M
ISBN 100160467020
LC Control Number95171867

Download Lifting PUHCA restrictions


The Repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of (PUHCA) and Its Impact on Electric and Gas Utilities Summary The Public Utility Holding Company Act of was repealed in the Energy Policy Act of Prior to repeal, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of required “holding companies,” i.e., companies with subsidiaries engaged in the electric utility business or the.   The Occupational Safety and Health Administration does not have a set requirement limiting the amount of weight a person can be required to lift in the performance of his job. They do have guidelines specifying the general duty guidelines of jobs and do expect employers to set safe lifting limits for employees. OSHA. After 70 years the US Public Utility Holding Company Act of (PUHCA) has been retired. PUHCA, with its accompanying Federal Power Act, was arguably the first big step towards the effective regulation of the energy sector anywhere in the world, a trend that resulted in some of the most significant legislative and economic changes since the Industrial Revolution. The lifting equation establishes a maximum load of 51 pounds, which is then adjusted to account for how often you are lifting, twisting of your back during lifting, the vertical distance the load is lifted, the distance of the load from your body, the distance you move while lifting the load, and how easy it .

The definition of a holding company subject to PUHCA is quite broad. Absent an exemption, any company that owns, controls or holds 10 percent or more of the outstanding voting securities of a public utility is presumed to be a public utility holding company .   Lifting operations can often put people at risk of injury, as well as incurring great costs when they go wrong. The Lifting Operations and Lif ting Equipment Regulations , which are often abbreviated to LOLER, LOLER Regulations or LOLER , place duties on people and companies who own, operate or have control over lifting equipment.. In most cases, lifting equipment will also be . PUHCA The Public Utility Holding Company Act of was passed to protect consumers from the complex holding company structures and cross-share ownerships of many of the electric and gas utilities in the s. New technology can help avoid a second Enron: the SEC needs reporting processes for the information age. The Public Utility Holding Company Act of (PUHCA), also known as the Wheeler-Rayburn Act, was a US federal law giving the Securities and Exchange Commission authority to regulate, license, and break up electric utility holding limited holding company operations to a single state, thus subjecting them to effective state also broke up any holding companies with.

PUHCA is one of the most harmful – yet one of the least-discussed – provisions in the House energy bill. Out of concern of the threat PUHCA repeal has for consumers and states’ ability to protect consumers, the 75 organizations listed below strongly urge that Congress preserve PUHCA. 1: See Act section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. § 79a(b).: 2: See Public Utility Holding Company Act Amendments: Hearings on S. , S. and S. Before the Subcomm. On Securities of the Senate Comm. On Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 97 th Cong., 2d Sess. (statement of SEC).: 3: The study focused primarily on registered holding company systems, of which there were, at . PUHCA REPEAL FOR DUMMIES - The Sequel* June And we will all really be dummies if we allow PUHCA to be repealed. Chirpy congressional aide to sad PUHCA Poobah*: Q. So, old Poobah, you claim the sky will fall if PUHCA is repealed? A. No, the sky will . Cindy Bogarad is a partner in the Washington, D.C. firm of Spiegel & McDiarmid, where she represents municipal and rural cooperative utilities. After graduating from law school, she served as law clerk to Federal District Court Judge Walter Jay Skinner. Ms. Bogorad holds a J.D. degree from Harvard University and a B.A. degree from the University of Pennsylvania.