by Foreign Policy Institute, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C. (1619 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington 20036-2297) .
Written in English
|Statement||Bernard L. Schwartz.|
|Series||FPI policy briefs|
|Contributions||Johns Hopkins University. Foreign Policy Institute.|
|LC Classifications||HD9743.U6 S4 1992|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||11 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||11|
|LC Control Number||92189122|
The term defense industrial base (or DIB), also known as the defense industrial and technological base, is used in political science to refer to a government's industrial assets that are of direct or indirect importance for the production of equipment for a country's armed is loosely associated with realism, which views the state as the preponderant guarantor of security, and. Get this from a library! Deterrence in decay: the Future of the U.S. defense industrial base: the final report of the CSIS Defense Industrial Base Project. [Jeff Bingaman; John McCain; James Blackwell; Center for Strategic and International Studies . Get this from a library! Deterrence in decay: the future of the U.S. defense industrial base: the final report of the CSIS Defense Industrial Base Project ; project director: James Blackwell.. [James Blackwell; Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.). Defense Industrial Base Project.;]. Since , the characteristics and size of the U.S. defense industrial base have changed significantly. Although, the defense industrial base certainly existed during World War II, the Korean War, and throughout most of the Cold War and the conflict in Southeast Asia, the term has become less relevant in recent years.
Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work discussed the potential of teaming troops with machines to give the nation an advantage over adversaries during the Reagan National Defense Forum. In discussions with the Air Force, the National Research Council (NRC) was asked to provide a report that addresses the effects of U.S. defense industrial base shrinkage and the aerospace industry’s ability to continue to attract and maintain requisite aerospace engineering talent to be able to produce cutting-edge military products to support the Defense Department’s (DoD’s) . Those who believe we do not need to worry about the health of our defense industrial base and propose free trade and globalization as remedies are wrong. Consider our high-tech defense industry. President Donald Trump has identified a fact few of his recent predecessors have understood: the Defense Industrial Base of the United States (DIB) is a critical component of our national security.
Looked at differently, U.S. defense spending as a share of the global total will decline from about 45 percent in recent years to 35 percent or so, and the American military edge over China might Author: Michael E. O'hanlon. The National Defense Strategy mandates increasing the capacity, lethality, and survivability of America's joint force in the threat environments of the 21st century. CSBA’s latest report assesses five critical priorities for the U.S. Air Force’s combat air . Compare that with U.S. manufacturing-productivity growth of just percent. The sad trend is that U.S. manufacturing productivity grew 23 times faster from to than it . A robust defense industrial-government network consisting of 30 Divisions, three Industrial Committees, and ad-hoc Working Groups. These organizations are driving the future of defense through education, access, and collaboration. Follow the links to learn more about activities, missions, and contacts.